Site Menu

April 7th, 2013 29 comments

We earn a commission for products purchased through some links in this article.

The Rings of Akhaten Overnight Viewing Figures

The Rings of Akhaten Overnight Viewing Figures

The Rings of Akhaten had an overnight audience of 5.5 million viewers, a share of 28.8% of the total TV audience.

These overnight figures have become increasingly unreliable as to the true audience. Final figures will be available in a few days time.

Source www.doctorwhonews.net



Adverts/Affiliates

29 comments

  • Davros

    July 24th, 2014 - 5:32pm

    One of my worst episodes ever, The Effects are Rubbish the Monsters look So Fake. And The Story line is awful.

    Reply
    • the astronaut of death

      July 24th, 2014 - 6:36pm

      No it wasnt

  • Mason Bingley Same Bday as Matt

    May 6th, 2013 - 9:35pm

    I think the viewing figures have dropped especially after The Crimson Horror only getting 4.61 million overnight and back in series 4 it got around 7 million for a mid episode like this and not including iplayer views on the final rating may hide the true rating 🙂

    Reply
  • Dalek The Supreme

    April 9th, 2013 - 6:29pm

    After a second viewing, I think my opinion of this episode has changed. I think it’s on par with The Bells of St. John now.

    Reply
    • Dalek The Supreme

      April 9th, 2013 - 6:32pm

      Sorry, meant to post this on the “What Did You Think Of The Rings of Akhaten” page.

  • Ian c

    April 8th, 2013 - 5:02pm

    Without question this was the worst program since the Drs resurrection in the modern era. Poor plot, poorly executed. I hope the usual high standard returns next week

    Reply
    • aaron meades

      April 13th, 2013 - 12:15pm

      I didn’t like it either I liked the companion and the dr but it was not scary at all and was quite short

  • Anonymous

    April 7th, 2013 - 8:09pm

    Yes, but it seemed to happen in the space of a year, before series 6 began. There was never any fuss about this “overnight” and “final” figure stuff until the Impossible Astronaut performed worse than expected.

    Reply
  • Harold Saxon

    April 7th, 2013 - 12:55pm

    The figures will bulk up im sure,many people will catch up on sunday i expect

    Reply
    • McGann is the Doctor

      April 7th, 2013 - 1:04pm

      Not to mention those who record it on the night, or watch it on BBC HD, like moi !

      Seriously, that was a great episode to watch on BBC HD.

    • TheWhomobile

      April 7th, 2013 - 1:30pm

      Does watching it on BBC HD not count towards the viewing figures?
      And it did look great in HD 😀

  • RORY DOCTOR RIVER POND

    April 7th, 2013 - 11:21am

    the eleventh hour had over 10 million viewers… youch.

    Reply
    • booboo

      April 7th, 2013 - 11:25am

      New Doctor always high,

      Parting of the ways which was very heavily advertised had i final figures 6.91 million yet the bells of st John are ready over 8.3 million

      The viewing figures are fine for this type of programme

    • RORY DOCTOR RIVER POND

      April 7th, 2013 - 11:27am

      Interesting…

    • Anonymous

      April 7th, 2013 - 12:22pm

      No, because Fires of Pompeii was 8 million, and The Shakespear Code got 7 million, and Tooth and Claw got a massive 9 million, and even Day Of The Moon got 7 million, this episode didn’t get as many viewers as other 2nd episodes get.

    • booboo

      April 7th, 2013 - 12:27pm

      You dont know the final figure yet.

      millions are still watching the show all in all and it different ways, i’m sure the BBC are quite happy with it

    • RORY DOCTOR RIVER POND

      April 7th, 2013 - 3:02pm

      Even more interesting…

  • Whomobile

    April 7th, 2013 - 11:13am

    Why is doctor who on so early???
    If it was on at, say, 7 more people would be home to tune in to watch.

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      April 7th, 2013 - 12:24pm

      I think it’s because the BBC are putting their talent show The Voice on everywhere, they’re trying to beat ITV’s Britain’s Got Talent for some reason? So they’re mixing around all the schedules to get more ratings.

    • Joe

      April 7th, 2013 - 2:33pm

      The Voice is terrible

  • drjakeyoung

    April 7th, 2013 - 10:17am

    that is not very high compared to most other episodes!

    Reply
    • Anonymous

      April 7th, 2013 - 10:46am

      I agree. Everyone says “Oh, but loads more people will catch up on iPLayer.” But back when Doctor Who pulled in 7/8 million viewers, iPlayer did exist, and people used it to catch up. People are talking like iPlayer and video recording only existed when series 6 began (when the ratings dropped.) No. In days of old, Doctor Who pulled in 7/8 million overnight and another 2 million or whatever on iPlayer.

      I’m sorry, but the fact is that Doctor Who has lost viewers. Anyone who says otherwise is in denial.

    • booboo

      April 7th, 2013 - 11:21am

      its lost a few overall , hardly drastic, final figures for the bells of St John are ready over 8.3 million without iplayer

      Time shifts are now massive compared with few years go

    • Anonymous

      April 7th, 2013 - 11:35am

      lol :~D but if you think about it, it’s more than a few. It’s gone from 8 million overnight on a good night to about six million on a good night. I ‘d say it’s lost around 2 million viewers, taking iPlayer into account as well. Now, if Steven Moffat can keep it at that level then it’s fine, all we gotta hope is that no more switch off.

    • booboo

      April 7th, 2013 - 11:44am

      your talking a drop in overnight figures

      New Earth had an overnight of 8.3 million and a final rating 8.62 million

      Bells of St John had 6.2 overnight and the final ratings are at 8.3 so far with 2 more days to come in plus a lot more people will be using iplayer

      The fact is people are not watching it “on the Night” like they used to

      The problem is people are just looking at the overnight figures which yes show a huge drop but without realising what the final figures are ending up like.

    • Anonymous

      April 7th, 2013 - 11:58am

      You clearly know more than I do, but the huge overnight drop does show a problem. All the alternative viewing methods such as iPlayer and recording existed a few years ago, and they raked in more viewers just as they do now. But now, about 8 mil is considered a good final figure. That was considered a good overnight a few years ago.

    • The Silence

      April 7th, 2013 - 12:03pm

      People’s viewing habits are changing, that’s all. While the majority of people chose to watch it ‘live’ a few years ago, more are chossing to catch up later on ‘iPlayer’ now.

    • drjakeyoung

      April 7th, 2013 - 11:22pm

      most casual fans (the kind that aren’t that bothered)will just quickly watch it latter on i player.

    • Matt smithy

      April 8th, 2013 - 10:04am

      Everyone is saying “the overnights have dropped, I player existed back in 2006, you have to loo at the overnights!”. As said many times before me, peoples interests change. Back in 2006, more people watched it live than on I-player, but with more and more people learning how to interact on the internet everyday, less people rush home from jobs to watch episodes so that they can finish shopping, work etc. then catch up on I player or on record. Yes, it existed in 2006, but less people used the internet and I player. It’s been 8 years since the reboot, and even in that time we live in a much more cybernetic world (hopefully we won’t become cybermen anytime soon!)

Leave a Reply to RORY DOCTOR RIVER POND Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.

By clicking submit you agree to our terms and conditions (below), we reserve the right to edit or delete inappropriate messages.

Comment rules

The Doctor Who site welcomes constuctive comments related to the news article in question. Links posted in comments may not be displayed. We reserve the right to delete or edit any post entirely at our discretion. If you leave unacceptable comments your IP address will be banned and reported

Click here to read full comments terms and conditions

Twitter

Facebook